Termination of employment can have serious financial and professional consequences. In Poland, an employee who believes that dismissal was unlawful, unjustified or procedurally defective may challenge it before the labour court. The available remedies and the applicable procedure depend, among other factors, on the type of employment contract, the form of termination and the reason given by the employer.
The phrase unfair dismissal Poland is often used by foreign employees searching for information about Polish employment law. It generally refers to a situation in which termination does not comply with the Labour Code, lacks a legally sufficient reason, violates special employee protection or fails to meet formal requirements. Each case requires an individual legal assessment, particularly because small differences in the wording of an employer’s notice may affect the prospects and scope of a claim.
Dismissal with notice and summary dismissal in Poland
Polish law distinguishes between termination with notice and termination without notice, commonly referred to as summary dismissal. These are different legal mechanisms and should not be treated in the same way.
Termination with notice ends the employment relationship after a notice period. The length of that period normally depends on the employee’s length of service with the employer. During the notice period, employment generally continues, although the employee may be released from the obligation to perform work or placed on leave in accordance with applicable rules.
For an employment contract concluded for an indefinite period, and currently also for a fixed-term contract, the employer is required to indicate the reason for termination with notice. The reason should be real, specific and sufficiently clear. A general statement such as “loss of trust” or “organisational changes” may not be enough if it does not explain the actual circumstances behind the decision. The labour court examines whether the reason existed and whether it justified termination in the circumstances of the particular case.
Summary dismissal is more serious because the employment relationship may end immediately, without observing a notice period. It is permitted only in circumstances defined by law, such as a serious breach of the employee’s basic duties, a criminal offence committed during employment under the required conditions, or the loss of a licence or qualification necessary to perform the work. The employer must identify the reason for the immediate dismissal, and that reason should be communicated within the statutory time limit. A dismissal that is merely inconvenient for the employer, but does not meet the statutory requirements, may be challenged.
Reasons for dismissal and trade-union consultation
One of the central issues in an employment dispute is whether the reason given by the employer is genuine and legally sufficient. The court may analyse the employee’s performance, alleged misconduct, organisational changes, business restructuring, redundancy process, absence from work or other circumstances referred to in the termination document.
An employer should not rely on a reason that was created after the dismissal or introduce an entirely different justification only during court proceedings. This is why the exact wording of the termination statement is important. Employees should keep the original document, envelope, email or other evidence showing when and how the statement was delivered.
Where an employee is represented by a trade union, the employer may be required to consult the union before termination. In the case of termination with notice, the employer generally notifies the relevant union organisation of its intention and the reason for dismissal. The union may submit objections within the statutory period. In cases of termination without notice, consultation also applies in circumstances specified by the Labour Code, although the procedure and time limits differ.
Failure to conduct mandatory consultation, consultation with the wrong organisation or consultation based on an incomplete description of the reason may constitute a procedural defect. It does not automatically determine the outcome of every case, but it may be relevant to the court’s assessment of whether termination complied with the law.
The 21-day deadline for appealing to the labour court
An employee who wants to challenge termination should pay particular attention to the deadline. A claim concerning termination with notice or termination without notice should generally be filed with the labour court within 21 days from delivery of the employer’s statement of termination. The date of delivery is therefore often more important than the date written on the document.
The claim is filed with the competent labour court. Depending on the circumstances, jurisdiction may be connected with the employer’s registered office, the place where work was performed or another legally recognised connection. The filing should identify the parties, describe the employment relationship, explain why the dismissal is considered unlawful and specify the requested remedy.
If the deadline was missed for reasons beyond the employee’s control, restoration of the deadline may sometimes be requested. Such applications are assessed strictly and should be prepared without delay after the obstacle ends. Waiting to obtain a full legal opinion may create additional risk, so a prompt consultation is advisable when the deadline is approaching.
Reinstatement or compensation: possible remedies
Depending on the type of dismissal and the employee’s position, the employee may seek reinstatement or compensation. Reinstatement means returning to the previous job under the conditions resulting from the court’s judgment. This remedy may be considered where the employee wants to continue working and the employment relationship can reasonably be maintained.
Compensation is a financial remedy. Its amount and limits depend on the legal basis of the claim, the type of termination and the employee’s remuneration. The court may also consider whether reinstatement is impossible or unreasonable in the particular circumstances. A claim for reinstatement is not always converted automatically into compensation, but the court may apply rules allowing a different remedy where the statutory conditions are met.
The employee should collect evidence before filing a claim. Relevant materials can include the employment contract, amendments, termination statement, performance reviews, correspondence, internal policies, records of working time, witness details and documents relating to alleged organisational changes. Electronic communications should be preserved in their original form where possible. A legal analysis should also consider whether the employee has already accepted other employment, signed a settlement or received documents that could affect the claim.
Special protection against dismissal
Some employees benefit from enhanced protection. Pregnancy is a significant example. Subject to statutory exceptions, an employer may not terminate an employment contract with a pregnant employee by notice and may be restricted from terminating it without notice. The exact protection can depend on the type of contract, the employee’s medical status and the circumstances relied upon by the employer.
Another important category concerns employees approaching retirement age. Under the Labour Code, an employee who lacks no more than four years before reaching retirement age may be protected against termination with notice, provided that the period of employment allows the person to obtain the right to a pension upon reaching that age. This protection is not absolute. It may be affected by factors such as the employee’s entitlement to a pension, liquidation of the employer or other statutory exceptions.
Special rules may also apply to employees on parental leave, employees protected by trade-union regulations, elected employee representatives and persons absent because of illness. The existence of protection does not mean that every termination is invalid, but it can materially change the legal assessment. Individual advice is particularly important where several protective rules overlap.
Why legal analysis matters in a large city such as Warsaw
Employment disputes in Warsaw often involve international companies, complex organisational structures and bilingual employment documentation. The employee may communicate with a local manager, a foreign parent company and an external human resources department at the same time. This can make it difficult to determine who made the decision, which documents are legally relevant and whether the consultation procedure was correctly completed.
A consultation with an employment lawyer can help establish the deadline, identify possible procedural defects and assess whether reinstatement or compensation is a realistic remedy. The matter concerns labour law rather than a criminal case. Terms such as prawo karne, sprawa karna, postępowanie karne, adwokat karny, prawnik karny and kancelaria karna relate to criminal proceedings and should not be confused with representation in an employment dispute. However, if the dismissal is connected with allegations of fraud, theft, harassment or another potential offence, the employment and criminal aspects may require separate legal analysis. In such a situation, the scope of an obrona w sprawie karnej may differ from the advice provided in the labour case.
FAQ: Unfair dismissal in Poland
Can an employee challenge dismissal without first signing a court document?
Yes. The employee does not need to sign an agreement with the employer in order to bring a claim. Signing an acknowledgement of receipt is generally different from accepting the legality of the dismissal, although the content of any document should be reviewed carefully.
What if the employer did not state a reason for termination?
Where the law requires a reason and the employer failed to provide one or provided an unclear reason, this may support a claim before the labour court. The court will assess the type of contract, the form of termination and the applicable legal requirements.
Can a foreign employee bring a labour claim in Poland?
Yes, a foreign employee may generally assert employment rights in Poland where Polish law and the Polish courts have jurisdiction. The language of the contract, place of work and international arrangements should be examined individually.
Does receiving severance pay prevent an employee from challenging dismissal?
Not necessarily. Receiving a statutory payment does not automatically remove the right to challenge termination. However, a settlement agreement, waiver or other document may affect available claims, so it should be assessed before it is signed.
Summary
An employee challenging dismissal in Poland should preserve all documents, determine the date of delivery of the termination statement and remember the 21-day deadline for filing a claim. The distinction between termination with notice and summary dismissal, the employer’s stated reason, trade-union consultation and special protection may all be decisive. Because the outcome depends on the facts and evidence, an individual legal consultation should be obtained promptly. For matters involving a separate criminal aspect, the available options can be considered through a ranking of criminal lawyers in Warsaw, including information about an adwokat karny, prawnik karny or kancelaria karna.
Dodaj komentarz